Honestly speaking, I think entity 170 had a decent idea and poor execution. Once I finish larger projects, I'll probably make a rewrite soon.

there was absolutely no thought in this one

I like entity 88, I think I did a good job on it. But it could have been better. When I wrote this, I had no idea how to make text seem like it was spoken or written by a human- Hell, I still struggle with that. I don't think it warrants a rewrite, but I'm going to keep the article- both its good elements and its shortcomings- in mind as I continue writing.

Object 4 was my fastest greenlight ever. I think it did okay with the scientific feel to it, but I sometimes worry it's too scientific. Getting the right mix of clinical and personal is yet another obstacle to overcome with writing, but when I find that combination, new opportunities will be opened.